The
mission of the student technology initiative in La Porte ISD is to “bridge the
digital divide by putting technology into the hands of every student, enhance
instruction by the systematic integration of technology into the classroom, and
empower students to take responsibility for their learning in a 21st
Century learning environment” (La Porte ISD, 2012). In order to meet this goal, our district has
instituted a 1:1 laptop program. In this
program, not only does each student have access to a laptop while in the
classroom, each student is allowed to check out laptops to take home to assist
in completing technology integrated assignments and homework. While research shows that “one-to-one
computing has had a significant impact on writing scores” and other areas of
student achievement, this has not been the case in our district (Holcomb,
2009). According to STAAR End-of-Course
data, the percentage of students that met the Level II: Satisfactory
achievement on the English I Writing assessment actually went down from 46% in
2012 to 42% in 2013. Likewise, the
percentage of students that met Level II: Satisfactory achievement on the
Algebra I assessment went from 78% in 2012 to 73% in 2013.
With
declining passing rates and the implementation of the Phase-In 2 Standards
looming, there is a need to increase student achievement on state assessments. As mentioned, according to research, our
district implementation of the 1:1 laptop program should be a positive
factor. One barrier to success for the
laptop program is minimal parent involvement.
According to interviews, parents are not able to help their students use
the laptops effectively due to the fact that they do not possess the technology
skills necessary. This inability of
parents to use the programs loaded onto the laptops effects homework, project
completion, and student success. In a
study on increasing involvement through parent workshops, research showed that
parent classes on desktop publishing and computer programming “had a
significant effect on their child's motivation toward learning” and parents
noticed “significant improvements in their children's math and reading skills”
(Funkhouser, Gonzalez, & Moles, 1997).
For these reasons, a partnership to provide technology training for
parents should be considered.
References:
Funkhouser, J. E., Gonzalez, M. R., & Moles, O. C. (1997). Family involvement in children’s education: Successful local approaches. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education website:
http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/FamInvolve/local3.html
Guhlin, M. (2003). 5 steps to fostering technology applications: TEKS curriculum in grades 6-8. Retrieved from http://mguhlin.wikispaces.com/5+Steps+to+Fostering+Technology+Applications-+TEKS+in+Grades+6-8
Holcomb, L. B. (2009). Results & lessons learned from1:1 laptop
initiatives: A collective review. TechTrends, 53(6). Retrieved
from http://gs121.wiki.elanco.net/file/view/Results+and+Lessons+Learned+from+1-2-1.pdf
La Porte ISD. (2012). Student Technology Initiative
Manual. Retrieved from http://www.lpisd.org/ourpages/auto/2013/6/21/67229726/STI_Program_Manual.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment